Security archive

Hardware wallet security incidents

A comprehensive, chronologically tracked history of security breaches, physical attacks, phishing campaigns, and supply-chain exploits across all major hardware wallet brands. Research reviewed October 30, 2026. Older entries without individual sources are marked as not rechecked.

10
Brands tracked
22
Brand-linked records
Oct 28 · Ledger
Latest wallet advisory
Selected reports
Coverage

All incidents, latest first

HighSupply Chain

Singapore Police advisory: tampered retail Ledger wallets

Brand:Ledger
Date:October 28, 2026

Singapore Police reported at least two cases since September 10, 2026 involving Ledger wallets purchased from some retail stores in Singapore. Preliminary investigations found malicious hardware capable of capturing recovery phrases or private keys.

Impact
Police reported about $3.5 million in total losses; the advisory does not explicitly label the currency, while local reporting identifies Singapore dollars. Do not add this to global CryptoBilis estimates: overlap is unknown.
Status / Countermeasure
The advisory names no retailers or models and does not establish a connection to the October 9 drains. Stop using suspected devices, contact official support and follow trusted migration guidance. Investigations were ongoing in the October 28 advisory.
HighSupply Chain

Ledger confirms distribution-channel implants and new retail controls

Brand:Ledger
Date:October 15, 2026

Ledger confirmed criminals bought genuine devices, added components capable of capturing recovery phrases and reintroduced them through Southeast Asian resellers. Its response reported no compromise of Ledger systems, its OS or Secure Element.

Impact
Authenticating a genuine Secure Element does not prove that the rest of a device enclosure contains no added hardware. Ledger did not confirm a global loss total.
Status / Countermeasure
Ledger suspended reseller/distributor sales in Southeast Asia and Hong Kong, prohibited resale of returned devices and strengthened stock-handling rules. Its examined German retail and warehouse samples were clean; this does not establish the safety of every device.
HighSupply Chain

MediaMarkt sales suspension reported; retail tampering investigated

Brand:Ledger
Date:October 13, 2026

The Block reported a MediaMarkt Saturn sales suspension after a German customer’s tampering report. This is not proof of confirmed compromised German stock. Ledger’s October 15 response says its examined German retail and warehouse samples were clean.

Impact
Scope and any losses from the German report remain unconfirmed in the primary material reviewed.
Status / Countermeasure
Ledger confirmed a precautionary reseller/distributor suspension in Southeast Asia and Hong Kong and strengthened retail handling rules.
CriticalSupply Chain

CryptoBilis reseller hardware implants expose recovery phrases

Brand:Ledger
Date:October 9, 2026

Modified genuine Ledger devices circulated through a Southeast Asian reseller channel. Ledger’s technical statement, reproduced in reporting, described an implant reading recovery phrases from the screen during setup and transmitting them via LTE/eSIM. This bypassed enclosure-level assurances without breaking the Secure Element.

Impact
Third-party investigators published differing loss estimates, including approximately $86M and $93M. Ledger has not confirmed a global total or affected-wallet count.
Status / Countermeasure
Do not initialize or restore a recovery phrase on a suspected device. Contact official Ledger Support. If an exposed phrase controls funds, migrate to a trusted signer with a newly generated phrase. A firmware update or restoring the old phrase elsewhere does not remove exposure.
CriticalFirmware Vulnerability

Seed-generation RNG flaw exploited against affected wallets

Brand:Coldcard (Coinkite)
Date:July 30, 2026

An RNG integration error routed vulnerable generation paths to a deterministic software fallback. Approximate 40-bit estimates apply to affected Mk2/Mk3 paths; Mk4/Mk5/Q affected generation was estimated around 72 bits. These are historical firmware-path estimates, not entropy ratings for every current device.

Impact
Multiple theft waves were reported. TRM’s August 5 analysis described approximately 1,816 BTC, then worth about $116M, from more than 5,200 addresses. Early 594 BTC and 1,083 BTC observations were not final totals; these cohorts must not be added together.
Status / Countermeasure
Minimum fixes: Mk2/Mk3 4.2.0; Mk4/Mk5 standard 5.6.0; Q standard 1.5.0Q; Mk4/Mk5 Edge 6.6.0X; Q Edge 6.6.0QX (or later fixed releases in the same track). Update before generating a replacement seed, then follow Coinkite’s migration guide. Updates and passphrases do not repair existing weak seeds. The advisory’s dice exception requires at least 50 fair, independent, private rolls correctly mixed into the final seed.
HighPhishing

Postal-mail phishing letters impersonating Ledger

Brand:Ledger
Date:February 13, 2026

Threat actors mailed physical letters on forged Ledger letterhead — complete with holograms, reference numbers and executive signatures — demanding recipients complete a mandatory 'Authentication Check' by scanning a QR code. The linked site harvested 24-word recovery phrases. Trezor owners received near-identical letters in the same wave.

Impact
Targeting appears to reuse addresses from old customer-data leaks. Any user who entered a recovery phrase lost full control of the wallet.
Status / Countermeasure
Ledger reiterated it never requests recovery phrases. No fix possible beyond user awareness — leaked address data cannot be recalled.
HighPhishing

Postal-mail phishing letters impersonating Trezor

Brand:Trezor
Date:February 13, 2026

The same snail-mail campaign that hit Ledger owners mailed forged Trezor 'security and compliance' letters with QR codes leading to recovery-phrase harvesting sites, styled as a mandatory firmware or transaction check.

Impact
Recovery-phrase theft for anyone who scanned and complied.
Status / Countermeasure
SatoshiLabs warned users publicly. Mitigation is awareness only.
HighData Breach

Global-e third-party customer-data breach

Brand:Ledger
Date:January 5, 2026 (disclosed)

Reporting quoting Ledger described unauthorized access to Global-e customer order and contact information. This was a third-party commerce-data incident, not a disclosed wallet or seed compromise.

Impact
Names and contact/order data could enable targeted phishing. The reviewed reports did not establish leaked recovery phrases or compromised Ledger devices.
Status / Countermeasure
Read the dated disclosure and remain wary of unsolicited support or recovery messages.
CriticalPhishing

Reported ~$282M support-impersonation theft

Brand:Trezor
Date:January 2026 (reported)

Security reporting described an individual persuaded by fake hardware-wallet support to reveal recovery information. Exact chronology and brand attribution were not established from original investigator evidence in this review.

Impact
Approximately $282M was reported stolen. This was social engineering, not a demonstrated firmware failure; inconsistent per-coin valuations and an unsupported service name have been removed.
Status / Countermeasure
The reviewed security analysis describes tracing and laundering. No completed full recovery was established.
HighPhishing

Support-form abuse sends phishing through automated replies

Brand:Trezor
Date:June 23, 2025 (reported)

Attackers abused Trezor’s support form to trigger automated replies containing malicious messages. Reporting described form and auto-response abuse, not proof of a stolen seed database.

Impact
Messages appearing to come from support could trick users into exposing recovery information. No aggregate loss was established by the reviewed report.
Status / Countermeasure
Trezor disabled the affected automation and warned users never to share backups.
HighPhishing

USPS letter campaign tied to the 2020 customer-data leak

Brand:Ledger
Date:April 29, 2025

Ledger customers received letters by USPS instructing them to 'validate' their wallet via a QR code or lose access. The letters carried accurate personal details, strongly suggesting the 2020 e-commerce database leak as the source list.

Impact
Recovery-phrase theft for anyone who complied. Individual losses not publicly aggregated.
Status / Countermeasure
Ongoing risk. Ledger maintains a public list of active phishing campaigns.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighApp Vulnerability

Mobile app private-key logging issue

Brand:Tangem
Date:December 31, 2024 (disclosed)

Tangem disclosed that activating with a generated or imported seed could log private-key material in its mobile app. Sending in-app support logs within seven days could expose those logs to support.

Impact
Tangem said fewer than 0.1% could potentially be affected and reported no funds lost or unauthorized access. These are manufacturer-reported findings.
Status / Countermeasure
Update the app and follow Tangem’s affected-user instructions. Seedless activation was not affected by this specific bug.
MediumData Breach

Third-party support portal breach (~66K users)

Brand:Trezor
Date:January 17, 2024

An attacker accessed a third-party customer-support tool used by Trezor and contacted ~66,000 users who had opened support tickets, posing as Trezor staff in phishing attempts.

Impact
No funds reported lost. Email addresses and ticket contents exposed.
Status / Countermeasure
Disclosed by Trezor within 24 hours. Vendor access revoked.
CriticalSupply Chain

Connect Kit supply-chain attack (~$600K drained)

Brand:Ledger
Date:December 14, 2023

A compromised publishing account distributed malicious Connect Kit versions that injected a drainer into affected dApp front ends. Users of multiple wallet brands were exposed; the hardware devices themselves were not physically compromised.

Impact
Approximately $600,000 was reported stolen. This is an attributed estimate; the exact malicious-code exposure period and affected-dApp count are not asserted here.
Status / Countermeasure
The malicious package was removed. Ledger pledged reimbursement and announced changes to publishing controls.
HighPhysical Attack

Unciphered extracts seed from Trezor T via voltage glitching

Brand:Trezor
Date:May 24, 2023

Security firm Unciphered published a video showing physical extraction of the seed from a passphrase-less Trezor T by glitching the STM32 chip. Requires physical possession, lab equipment and a few hours.

Impact
No remote risk. Anyone storing significant funds on a Trezor One/T without a strong passphrase is vulnerable if the device is lost or stolen.
Status / Countermeasure
Mitigation: BIP-39 passphrase. Cannot be patched on existing devices — chip is not a Secure Element. Trezor Safe 3 / Safe 5 add a Secure Element to address this.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

DisputedPolicy / Trust

Ledger Recover key-shard backup controversy

Brand:Ledger
Date:May 16, 2023

Ledger announced an optional subscription that would let the Secure Element split and encrypt the seed into three shards held by Coincover, Ledger and EscrowTech for ID-based recovery.

Impact
No funds lost, but the disclosure that signed firmware can extract seed-derived material if the user opts in undermined the long-standing 'the seed never leaves the device' marketing and triggered a major trust crisis in the community.
Status / Countermeasure
Feature shipped as opt-in. Open-sourcing of more device code committed in response.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighPhysical Attack

Unciphered — physical seed extraction from OneKey Mini

Brand:OneKey
Date:February 10, 2023

Unciphered demonstrated that the OneKey Mini's microcontroller could be glitched to dump the encrypted seed; the PIN could then be brute-forced offline.

Impact
Requires physical access. No remote exploit.
Status / Countermeasure
OneKey shipped a firmware patch that hardened anti-glitching countermeasures and later moved newer models to a Secure Element (OneKey Classic 1S, Pro).

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighPhishing

Mailchimp breach → mass phishing campaign

Brand:Trezor
Date:April 3, 2022

Attackers compromised Trezor's Mailchimp newsletter list and sent emails directing users to a fake 'Trezor Suite' download that asked for the seed phrase.

Impact
Unknown number of seed phrases harvested; multiple wallets drained.
Status / Countermeasure
Mailchimp account locked. Trezor migrated email infrastructure.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

DisputedFirmware Vulnerability

Kraken Security Labs publishes SafePal S1 findings

Brand:SafePal
Date:February 16, 2021 (disclosed)

Kraken published findings involving tamper detection and firmware handling in SafePal S1. SafePal disputed parts of the assessment and said downgrade protection had been patched.

Impact
The research did not establish user-fund theft. Researchers’ findings and the vendor’s response should be read together.
Status / Countermeasure
Follow current official firmware guidance and review the scope of the research.
HighData Breach

E-commerce database breach (~1M emails leaked)

Brand:Ledger
Date:June 25, 2020

An attacker exploited an API key on Ledger's marketing site and exfiltrated roughly 1 million email addresses, plus ~272,000 detailed records including names, postal addresses and phone numbers of customers who had ordered hardware wallets.

Impact
The dataset was dumped publicly on RaidForums in December 2020. Customers were targeted with waves of phishing emails, SMS smishing and even physical threats sent to their home addresses. Hardware wallets and seed phrases were never compromised, but real-world safety of holders was.
Status / Countermeasure
Customer data remains exposed and can be reused for phishing and threats. A 2024 class-action settlement was not established in this review.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighPhysical Attack

Kraken Security Labs — STM32 voltage-glitching disclosure

Brand:Trezor
Date:January 31, 2020

Kraken Security Labs detailed a $75 attack against the Trezor One and Model T using voltage glitching to bypass read protection and recover the encrypted seed.

Impact
Same as above — physical possession required, mitigated by a strong passphrase.
Status / Countermeasure
Acknowledged. Same mitigation path.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighPhysical Attack

Kraken Security Labs voltage-glitch attack

Brand:KeepKey (ShapeShift)
Date:December 10, 2019

Kraken Security Labs showed that a stolen KeepKey could be glitched to extract the encrypted seed in about 15 minutes for under $75 in equipment.

Impact
Physical theft scenario only. Passphrase mitigates.
Status / Countermeasure
No silicon-level fix possible on existing units. ShapeShift recommends using a BIP-39 passphrase.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

What the history actually shows

  • Offline keys can still be reconstructed or exposed. Coldcard’s affected RNG paths allowed offline reconstruction without remote device takeover. Ledger implants and Tangem’s app-logging issue affected different layers of key handling.
  • Keep attack layers separate. Customer-data leaks, malicious app code, weak randomness, physical implants and chip extraction require different mitigations. Loss estimates alone do not rank device safety.
  • Secure Element matters for physical attacks. Physical extraction demonstrations against legacy Trezor, KeepKey and OneKey Mini must not be generalized to all newer models. Secure Elements and strong passphrases are barriers, not protection against every implant, backup leak or coercion scenario.
  • Your data is part of your threat model. The 2020 Ledger leak proved that buying a hardware wallet from a retailer that handles customer addresses introduces a real, non-cryptographic physical-safety risk.

Compare wallets by what actually went wrong

Our hardware wallet comparison weighs Secure Element design, air-gap, open-source status and shipping/data practices — not just specs.

See the full comparison →

Sources include vendor post-mortems, Unciphered and Kraken Security Labs public disclosures, Ledger and Trezor official statements, court filings and chain-analysis reports. This selected archive is not exhaustive. Counts are brand-linked records; one campaign can affect multiple brands. Dated sources do not establish current investigation outcomes.

VaultRank

VaultRank is reader-supported. Some outbound links are referral links — they fund the site at no cost to you. © 2026 vaultrank.xyz.

Disclaimer: VaultRank is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or security advice. We accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of this site or reliance on its content. Always do your own research before acting on anything you read here.