DeFi & exchange archive

The biggest DeFi & crypto hacks of the last 10 years

A chronological record of major DeFi exploits, bridge hacks, oracle attacks, and centralized-exchange compromises from 2016 through 2026 — with reported amounts, attack vectors and dated outcomes. Reviewed October 30, 2026. Binance and Polymarket figures remain provisional.

45
Incidents tracked
~$15.0B
Gross reported impact
~$6.3B (Binance)
Largest reported impact
2016–2026
Years covered

All hacks, latest first

CriticalProtocol / Infrastructure

Binance

Chain:Multi-chain
Date:October 29, 2026
Loss:~$6.3B affected (preliminary gross estimate)

Binance’s October 30 initial investigation points to a compromised DevOps engineer’s laptop that allowed access to a service container and unauthorized withdrawals. Binance said it had found no evidence of leaked wallet private keys. A final technical post-mortem was still pending.

Outcome
At 02:25 UTC on October 30, Binance estimated ~$6.3B affected and ~$3B frozen on-chain. It pledged to cover all losses using SAFU and company funds, suspended deposits and withdrawals as a precaution, revoked affected authorization and engaged investigators. Frozen assets are not yet the same as returned funds.
Source / post-mortem ↗
MediumData Breach

Bithumb

Chain:Centralized exchange (South Korea)
Date:October 29, 2026 (breach October 27)
Loss:No confirmed asset loss; customer data leaked

An unauthorized external party accessed Bithumb’s internal mobile groupware system on October 27. Bithumb confirmed on October 29 that personal information of 6,444 customers was affected — 5,600 in encrypted files, while 844 had names, phone numbers, emails, resident registration numbers, bank account numbers and ID copies directly exposed.

Outcome
Bithumb blocked the access path, suspended mobile groupware use and apologized publicly. No crypto asset loss has been confirmed. South Korea’s Financial Services Commission opened an emergency inspection of the virtual asset industry in response. Users were warned of impersonation and voice-phishing risks from the leaked data.
Source / post-mortem ↗
MediumPrivate Key Compromise

Prabang

Chain:Centralized exchange (South Korea)
Date:October 29, 2026 (breach October 24)
Loss:~100M KRW (~$70K–85K)

South Korean exchange Prabang disclosed that an unauthorized outsider breached its systems on October 24 and drained roughly 100 million won from a hot wallet — the first confirmed asset loss in a wave of hacks hitting Korean crypto exchanges and financial firms in late October.

Outcome
Prabang suspended all services, reported the incident to authorities and pledged to fully reimburse affected customer assets from company funds. The investigation into the cause and full scope was ongoing at disclosure.
Source / post-mortem ↗
MediumFrontend / Supply Chain

Polymarket

Chain:Polygon
Date:October 29, 2026
Loss:~$2.5–2.73M (researcher estimates)

Polymarket said a third-party provider was compromised. Malicious JavaScript targeted international-platform traders, with researchers tracing roughly $2.5–2.73M; the company had not published a final aggregate loss or affected-user count.

Outcome
The cause was fixed and trading resumed after a temporary pause. Polymarket pledged full reimbursement; the reviewed reports do not establish completed reimbursement to every trader.
Source / post-mortem ↗
MediumProtocol / Infrastructure

Initia

Chain:Initia / Ethereum
Date:October 23, 2026
Loss:~$2.73M actual outflows; $7.48M minted face value

An attacker created unbacked tokens on Initia and redeemed them through bridges. Bitquery traced ~$2.73M of real assets paid from bridge reserves, distinct from the ~$7.48M face value of tokens minted.

Outcome
Initia halted the network and connected app chains at 15:41 UTC. Bitquery’s October 23 snapshot traced the outflows to 1,135.5 ETH; this is a dated snapshot, not a claim about current wallet balances.
Source / post-mortem ↗
MediumSmart Contract Bug

NEAR Intents

Chain:NEAR / BNB Chain
Date:September 29–October 1, 2026
Loss:~$3.8M; returned according to project

Failed deposit callbacks refunded tokens while retaining ledger credits, creating unbacked user balances. Valid bridge signers then paid withdrawals from other depositors’ reserves; this affected NEAR Intents rather than the NEAR base chain.

Outcome
NEAR Intents said funds were returned in full on October 2 and users made whole. A fix was deployed and the official post-mortem followed on October 16. Independent analysis distinguishes observed BTC returns from the project’s full-recovery statement.
Source / post-mortem ↗
HighFrontend / Supply Chain

Bitget

Chain:Ethereum, XRP Ledger, Tron, Zcash
Date:September 24, 2026
Loss:~$387.5M

A third-party infrastructure compromise allowed unauthorized withdrawal instructions to reach Bitget’s wallet systems. Investigation established a zero-day in one security product; a second appliance was also involved, but two distinct zero-days were not confirmed.

Outcome
Bitget reported approximately $387.5M affected and said it would cover losses. Investigators reported no evidence of leaked wallet private keys; attribution remains source-dependent.
Source / post-mortem ↗
HighProtocol / Infrastructure

Liquid Network (Blockstream)

Chain:Bitcoin sidechain
Date:September 6, 2026
Loss:~$320M

An Elements transaction-validation flaw allowed unbacked L-BTC to be created and redeemed against Liquid’s federation reserves. This was a sidechain validation failure, not an EVM smart-contract exploit.

Outcome
Reporting describes about 3,400 BTC returned after a patch, with 598.5 BTC remaining outstanding (around $47M at the report’s valuation). Recovered value is not subtracted from the gross incident estimate.
Source / post-mortem ↗
MediumPrivate Key Compromise

AFX Trade

Chain:Arbitrum
Date:July 22, 2026
Loss:~$24.2M

A fake recruiter from a non-existent firm got an AFX Trade developer to clone a malicious repository on July 9; a hidden payload gave the attacker the developer's machine and, with it, the protocol's bridge keys.

Outcome
AFX offered a 30% bounty for a return. The reviewed reporting does not establish that most funds were recovered.
Source / post-mortem ↗
MediumOracle Manipulation

Ostium

Chain:Arbitrum
Date:July 15, 2026
Loss:~$23.75M USDC

Compromised off-chain price infrastructure supplied manipulated prices to the perpetuals platform, enabling trades at false valuations. The Arbitrum base chain itself was not compromised.

Outcome
Ostium paused affected activity and published a post-mortem describing the pricing-infrastructure failure.
Source / post-mortem ↗
HighBridge Exploit

Kelp DAO (rsETH)

Chain:Ethereum + LayerZero (~20 chains)
Date:April 18, 2026
Loss:~$292M

A forged verification message in Kelp’s LayerZero integration released 116,500 rsETH, valued at approximately $292M. The incident exposed the integration’s verification configuration; it was not a blanket mint on every connected chain.

Outcome
Attributed to North Korea-linked actors. Funds laundered through mixers; largely unrecovered.
Source / post-mortem ↗
HighProtocol / Infrastructure

Drift Protocol

Chain:Solana
Date:April 1, 2026
Loss:~$295M (updated user-loss estimate)

Attackers used social engineering and valid pre-signed Solana durable-nonce transactions to gain administrative control and drain funds. The recovery update revised outstanding user losses above the initial ~$285M estimate.

Outcome
Drift’s April 16 recovery update put outstanding user losses at approximately $295M. Recovery and reimbursement proposals are not the same as completed repayments.
Source / post-mortem ↗
MediumPrivate Key Compromise

Step Finance

Chain:Solana
Date:January 31, 2026
Loss:~$40M (revised estimate)

Compromised executive devices led to unauthorized access to treasury wallets. Later reporting revised the incident from the initial ~$27M estimate to approximately $40M.

Outcome
Step reported approximately $4.7M recovered. This was a treasury-wallet incident, not a demonstrated user-contract exploit.
Source / post-mortem ↗
HighSmart Contract Bug

Balancer V2

Chain:Ethereum + multi-chain
Date:November 3, 2025
Loss:~$128M

A rounding-error bug in Balancer's composable stable pool math let crafted swaps extract value from the gap between internal accounting and real pool balances, across several chains at once.

Outcome
Vulnerable pools disabled; tens of millions recovered by white hats and distributed back to LPs.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

MediumPrivate Key Compromise

BtcTurk

Chain:Multi-chain
Date:August 14, 2025
Loss:~$48M

Turkey's oldest exchange reported unusual hot-wallet outflows consistent with compromised private keys; cold-storage reserves were untouched.

Outcome
Deposits and withdrawals halted, wallets rotated. Binance froze part of the stolen funds.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

MediumPrivate Key Compromise

CoinDCX

Chain:Multi-chain
Date:July 19, 2025
Loss:~$44.2M

A server-side breach gave an attacker access to CoinDCX's internal systems and its operational hot wallets.

Outcome
Exchange covered the loss from treasury; customer funds unaffected.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

MediumSmart Contract Bug

GMX V1

Chain:Arbitrum
Date:July 9, 2025
Loss:~$42M

A reentrancy-style flaw in a contract connected to the GLP liquidity pool let the attacker repeatedly withdraw more than their share.

Outcome
The exploiter returned the bulk of the funds in exchange for a bounty. GMX V1 was wound down.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

MediumPrivate Key Compromise

Nobitex

Chain:Multi-chain
Date:June 18, 2025
Loss:~$80–90M

Iran's largest exchange had its hot wallets drained during the Israel–Iran conflict. The politically motivated attackers burned much of the loot to vanity addresses rather than cashing out.

Outcome
Service gradually restored; wallet infrastructure rotated. Funds not recoverable.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

MediumSmart Contract Bug

Cork Protocol

Chain:Ethereum
Date:May 28, 2025
Loss:~$12M

A flaw in Cork's depeg-swap accounting allowed an attacker to extract wstETH from the protocol's pools.

Outcome
Cork paused affected contracts and published a post-mortem. Partial white-hat recovery was not established by the reviewed source.
Source / post-mortem ↗
HighSmart Contract Bug

Cetus

Chain:Sui
Date:May 22, 2025
Loss:~$223M

An overflow check flaw in Cetus's concentrated-liquidity math let an attacker mint near-worthless positions and drain roughly $223M of liquidity from the largest DEX on Sui.

Outcome
Sui validators froze ~$162M of the stolen funds; most was later returned to users.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

MediumSmart Contract Bug

Infini

Chain:Ethereum
Date:February 24, 2025
Loss:~$49.5M

An overlooked developer privilege left in Infini's contracts was used to drain protocol-controlled stablecoin reserves.

Outcome
Operations paused; access controls rebuilt. Partial clawback discussions with white hats.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

CriticalFrontend / Supply Chain

Bybit

Chain:Ethereum
Date:February 21, 2025
Loss:~$1.5B

A compromised Safe{Wallet} developer environment delivered a malicious signing interface. Bybit’s signers approved a transaction that changed its cold-wallet implementation, enabling approximately $1.5B in assets to be drained.

Outcome
Bybit covered user losses from its treasury. FBI attributed to TraderTraitor / Lazarus.
Source / post-mortem ↗
MediumPrivate Key Compromise

Phemex

Chain:Multi-chain
Date:January 23, 2025
Loss:~$85M

Attackers drained BTC, ETH and stablecoins from Phemex hot wallets in rapid succession, in an incident security firms linked to North Korean groups.

Outcome
Exchange covered user balances and rebuilt key management. Stolen funds routed through mixers.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighPrivate Key Compromise

WazirX

Chain:Ethereum
Date:July 18, 2024
Loss:~$235M

Attackers (linked to Lazarus Group) compromised WazirX's Liminal multi-sig and drained the exchange's hot wallet.

Outcome
Exchange paused withdrawals; restructuring scheme proposed to repay users.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighPrivate Key Compromise

DMM Bitcoin

Chain:Bitcoin
Date:May 31, 2024
Loss:~$305M

Japanese exchange DMM Bitcoin lost 4,502.9 BTC in an unauthorized withdrawal later attributed to North Korean actors.

Outcome
DMM borrowed funds to make customers whole, then wound down the exchange in late 2024.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighBridge Exploit

HTX / Heco Bridge

Chain:Heco / Ethereum
Date:November 22, 2023
Loss:~$113M

HTX (formerly Huobi) and the Heco cross-chain bridge were drained in coordinated exploits affecting hot wallets and bridge contracts.

Outcome
HTX pledged user reimbursement. Bridge paused.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighPrivate Key Compromise

Poloniex

Chain:Multi-chain
Date:November 10, 2023
Loss:~$125M

Justin Sun-owned Poloniex saw its hot wallets drained across Ethereum, Tron and Bitcoin networks after a private-key compromise.

Outcome
Sun committed to full reimbursement; partial on-chain recovery via bounty offer.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighPrivate Key Compromise

Mixin Network

Chain:Multi-chain
Date:September 22, 2023
Loss:~$200M

A cloud-service provider used by Mixin was breached, exposing keys to the network's main deposit/withdrawal wallet.

Outcome
Mixin offered partial repayment via tokenized debt; service paused.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

MediumSmart Contract Bug

Curve Finance

Chain:Ethereum
Date:July 30, 2023
Loss:~$73.5M

A Vyper compiler bug broke the reentrancy locks in several Curve stablepools (alETH, msETH, pETH, CRV/ETH), enabling reentrancy drains.

Outcome
White-hats recovered ~73% of funds. Vyper patched; Curve compensated remaining LPs.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighSmart Contract Bug

Euler Finance

Chain:Ethereum
Date:March 13, 2023
Loss:~$197M

A missing health check in the donateToReserves function allowed the attacker to push accounts into a self-liquidatable state and drain lending pools.

Outcome
After negotiations the attacker returned essentially all funds — among the largest white-hat-style returns ever.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighOracle Manipulation

BonqDAO

Chain:Polygon
Date:February 2, 2023
Loss:~$120M

The attacker manipulated the Tellor oracle price feed for AllianceBlock's ALBT token to mint BEUR stablecoin against worthless collateral.

Outcome
Most stolen tokens proved illiquid; protocol effectively wound down.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighOracle Manipulation

Mango Markets

Chain:Solana
Date:October 11, 2022
Loss:~$117M

Avraham Eisenberg pumped the MNGO perp price on thin spot liquidity, used the inflated collateral to borrow out the treasury.

Outcome
Eisenberg was convicted in 2024, but that verdict was vacated in May 2025. Do not read the earlier conviction as a final, currently standing outcome.
Source / post-mortem ↗
CriticalBridge Exploit

BNB Chain Token Hub Bridge

Chain:BNB Chain
Date:October 6, 2022
Loss:~$569M

Attacker forged a fake Merkle proof in the Token Hub bridge and minted 2M BNB. Validators halted the chain mid-attack.

Outcome
BNB Chain stopped block production; ~$430M frozen. Net stolen ~$100–140M.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighBridge Exploit

Nomad Bridge

Chain:Multi-chain
Date:August 2, 2022
Loss:~$190M

A misconfigured initialization let any address spoof valid messages. Once one wallet started draining, hundreds copy-pasted the exploit calldata — the first 'free-for-all' bridge hack.

Outcome
Nomad recovered ~20% from white-hats; bridge effectively defunct.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighBridge Exploit

Harmony Horizon Bridge

Chain:Harmony / Ethereum
Date:June 24, 2022
Loss:~$100M

Lazarus Group compromised two of five multi-sig signers (held with insufficient separation) and drained the bridge.

Outcome
Attributed to North Korea by the FBI. Funds laundered via Tornado Cash.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighGovernance Attack

Beanstalk Farms

Chain:Ethereum
Date:April 17, 2022
Loss:~$182M

Attacker took a flash loan to obtain a supermajority of governance stalk and instantly executed a malicious proposal that sent the treasury to themselves.

Outcome
Protocol redeployed months later via community-funded restart.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

CriticalBridge Exploit

Ronin Bridge (Axie Infinity)

Chain:Ronin / Ethereum
Date:March 23, 2022
Loss:~$624M

Lazarus Group socially engineered a Sky Mavis engineer via a fake LinkedIn job offer, compromising 5 of 9 bridge validator keys and draining 173,600 ETH + 25.5M USDC.

Outcome
Sky Mavis and Binance reimbursed users; OFAC sanctioned the laundering addresses.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighBridge Exploit

Wormhole Bridge

Chain:Solana / Ethereum
Date:February 2, 2022
Loss:~$326M

Attacker forged signatures via a flawed signature-verification routine and minted 120K wETH on Solana without backing.

Outcome
Jump Crypto refilled the bridge from its own funds within 24 hours.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighPrivate Key Compromise

BitMart

Chain:Multi-chain
Date:December 5, 2021
Loss:~$196M

Hot-wallet private keys for BitMart's Ethereum and BNB Chain wallets were stolen and drained.

Outcome
BitMart pledged to use its own funds to reimburse affected users.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

CriticalBridge Exploit

Poly Network

Chain:Multi-chain
Date:August 10, 2021
Loss:~$611M

Attacker exploited a privileged cross-chain function (EthCrossChainManager) to mint and withdraw assets across Ethereum, BSC and Polygon.

Outcome
Attacker ("Mr White Hat") returned virtually all funds within two weeks.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

HighFlash Loan

PancakeBunny

Chain:BNB Chain
Date:May 19, 2021
Loss:~$200M

Flash-loan attack manipulated the BUNNY/BNB pool, minting ~7M BUNNY and crashing the token from $146 to near zero.

Outcome
Token never recovered; compensation plan via vBUNNY released later.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

MediumSmart Contract Bug

Uranium Finance

Chain:BNB Chain
Date:April 28, 2021
Loss:~$50M

A migration to v2.1 contained an off-by-one math error in the swap fee logic, letting the attacker drain pool reserves in a single swap.

Outcome
Protocol shut down. Funds laundered via Tornado Cash.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

MediumFlash Loan

bZx

Chain:Ethereum
Date:February 15–18, 2020
Loss:~$954K (combined)

Two back-to-back attacks pioneered the 'DeFi flash loan' playbook by manipulating oracle prices using uncollateralized loans from dYdX.

Outcome
First widely cited proof that flash loans break naive on-chain oracle designs. Catalyst for TWAP/Chainlink adoption.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

CriticalPrivate Key Compromise

Coincheck

Chain:NEM
Date:January 26, 2018
Loss:~$534M

Coincheck's NEM hot wallet was drained of 523M XEM after attackers planted malware via spear-phishing on employee machines.

Outcome
Coincheck reimbursed users from its own funds; later acquired by Monex Group. Catalyzed FSA regulation in Japan.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

MediumSmart Contract Bug

The DAO

Chain:Ethereum
Date:June 17, 2016
Loss:~$60M (at the time)

A reentrancy bug in the split-DAO function let the attacker recursively drain 3.6M ETH from the largest crowdfunded smart contract.

Outcome
Ethereum hard-forked to reverse the theft, creating Ethereum Classic. Reshaped smart-contract security forever.

Legacy entry — individual source not yet rechecked.

What 10 years of hacks tell us

  • Bridges and centralized custodians dominate the losses. Ronin, Poly, Wormhole, Nomad, BNB Chain, Bybit, Coincheck — the largest single events have all been custody or cross-chain trust failures, not pure smart-contract bugs.
  • North Korea (Lazarus / TraderTraitor) is the single biggest threat actor. Ronin, Harmony, DMM Bitcoin, WazirX and Bybit alone account for over $2.5B attributed to DPRK-linked groups.
  • Hardware wallets reduce key exposure, not contract risk. Keeping funds out of custodial wallets reduces exchange exposure. Assets deposited in bridges or DeFi contracts still face protocol risk, and malicious approvals can drain a wallet even when a hardware device signs them.
  • DeFi has matured but new vectors keep appearing. From reentrancy (The DAO) to flash loans (bZx) to compiler bugs (Curve/Vyper) to signer phishing (Bybit) — the attack surface evolves faster than audits cover.

Move funds off exchanges

Our hardware wallet comparison ranks devices by Secure Element design, air-gap, open-source status and supply-chain practices.

See the full comparison →

Gross reported impact sums this selected archive’s incident estimates, before freezes, recoveries or reimbursements. Some historical figures include minted or market-value impact rather than realized theft, so the total is not a net-loss statistic. New and rechecked entries link to sources; legacy entries remain marked where not rechecked.

VaultRank

VaultRank is reader-supported. Some outbound links are referral links — they fund the site at no cost to you. © 2026 vaultrank.xyz.

Disclaimer: VaultRank is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial, investment, or security advice. We accept no liability for any loss or damage arising from the use of this site or reliance on its content. Always do your own research before acting on anything you read here.